![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
First the basic fare rose by 10 cents several weeks ago. Well, that’s a miniscule increase and didn’t appear to be much of an issue. However, in the newspapers today, the drastic hike in taxi fares got my blood boiling. Not only will the basic fare increase by another 30 cents, both surcharges and meter fare will be raised as well. In the latest overhaul, every 385m covered will incur 20 cents compared to the previous 440m which bore the same price. And after the first 10km covered, an additional 20 cents will be charged for every 330m traveled. The only consolation is the auto booking fee, which dropped by a mere 50 cents from an initial $4. Well, it doesn’t cause much of a difference, does it? A 12.5% decrease against a 10 – 49% increase still results in an overall percentage increase. And that 10% increase doesn't have anything to do with auto booking fees. Petrol prices rise, drivers feel the pinch and passengers burn large holes in their pockets. Perhaps this vicious economic cycle works that way but ultimately, the users bear it all. I really wonder how the fare increments will help the cabbies when drastic percentage increases shun off potential passengers. Let’s not take into account those who urgently or desperately need a cab. When ComfortDelGro initiated its overhaul, did it take into consideration the physically disabled and the elderly? Or even the lower income group in Singapore? How many can afford to take such a mode of transport when the government time and again encouraged citizens to take public transportations? With its objective in reducing the number of cars on the road by jacking up the ERP to a frightening $5 during the peak hours along PIE, doesn’t the action of Singapore’s largest taxi provider contradict the intentions of the government? It was mentioned that this decision came after suggestions from the public. But I suppose it will cause a public outcry instead. Not every Singaporean is rich enough to afford a cab when it is so expensive. So where does this head to? In the end, I don’t see how cabbies can earn or perhaps even make losses for no one is willing to hail a cab now. Even though I come from a moderately well-to-do family, I personally feel that the overhaul is ridiculous. Slight changes could be made but not such drastic ones. Singaporeans are adverse to changes especially when their money is of concern. Right now, i rather opt for less comfort than to add on to the burden in my bank account. Posted by Lynette at |
|
Me Lynette Lee Capricorn NTU (NBS)Loves FamilyFriends Food Tennis Wishes Healthy family and friendsDo voluntary work More clothes and shoes! Chat Past September 2005October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Dar'links LinksBaoyi Dave Dezhi Dickson Edison Elaine Erwin Huiling Jocelyn Leonard Mingyang Pamela Qiqi Sinned Stephie Teresa Weisiong Yizhen My New Blog Friend credits Designer Eric SimPictures Foto Decadent Brushes and Textures Hybrid Genesis, Misprinted- Type, and Eric Sim Pattern Squidfingers |
![]() |